Financial services licensing comparison
Compare financial licensing requirements across jurisdictions.
LicenseCompare helps you understand and compare securities, fund management, advisory, brokerage, and related licensing routes in Hong Kong, Singapore, the UK, the US, and Australia.
Jurisdictions
Compare five regulatory routes
HK
Hong Kong
Securities and Futures Commission
SFC licensed corporation for Type 1 dealing in securities
SG
Singapore
Monetary Authority of Singapore
MAS Capital Markets Services licence for fund management
UK
United Kingdom
Financial Conduct Authority
FCA Part 4A authorisation for investment firms
US
United States
SEC / FINRA / state securities regulators
SEC investment adviser registration through IARD and Form ADV
AUS
Australia
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Australian financial services licence for financial services business
Application process
Turn a licence route into an evidence plan
HK
Hong Kong SFC licence application process
Confirm the legal applicant, Hong Kong presence, group structure, substantial shareholders, directors, and intended regulated activities.
SG
Singapore MAS CMS licence application process
Confirm the Singapore applicant entity, UEN, controllers, directors, CEO/key executives, compliance owner, AML/CFT owner, and representative model.
UK
UK FCA authorisation application process
Confirm whether authorisation is needed and do not carry on regulated activities while the application is under review unless an exemption or temporary permission applies.
US
US SEC adviser and FINRA broker-dealer application process
Build a compensation map before route selection; transaction-based or success-fee compensation is a broker-dealer red flag even where the business calls itself advisory or consulting.
AUS
Australia AFSL application process
Confirm the applicant entity, responsible managers, controllers, representatives, business description, financial services, financial products, client type, and launch geography.
Licence requirements
Start from the activity, then test the jurisdiction
Learn
NBFI and securities concepts without fluff
Exams and qualifications
Pick the role before picking an exam
Career paths
Learn the field through real licensing touchpoints
Official register monitoring
Open official registers in a new tab
Register links are treated as primary due diligence routes. LicenseCompare summarizes the path, then sends users to the regulator record for relevance checking.
Register directoryLatest guides
How to choose between Hong Kong and Singapore for an asset management licence
A practical decision guide for new asset managers comparing SFC Type 9 and Singapore MAS fund management routes.
SFC Type 1, Type 4 and Type 9 explained by business model
A practical mapping of Hong Kong SFC Type 1, Type 4 and Type 9 to dealing, advice, fund distribution, and portfolio management workflows.
Singapore MAS CMS licence: what new fund managers should understand
A decision-focused guide to MAS CMS licence issues for Singapore fund managers, representatives, client type, and application preparation.
UK FCA authorisation for investment firms: practical overview
How investment managers, advisers, and brokerage firms should think about FCA permissions, SM&CR, forecasts, CASS, and application evidence.
Official-source updates
FCA SM&CR page reflects April 2026 reform context
The FCA SM&CR landing page was source-checked on 2026-06-05 and showed a 24 April 2026 update marker. UK applicants should treat senior accountability mapping as current, not legacy, application evidence.
mediumFINRA enhanced Form NMA transition is active in 2026
FINRA Regulatory Notice 26-09 states that enhanced Form NMA launched on 15 April 2026, with legacy draft transition steps before mid-July 2026.
mediumASIC AFSL applications are now portal-led
ASIC AFSL pages source-checked on 2026-06-05 state that new AFS licence applications, variations, cancellations, and certain changes are made through the ASIC Regulatory Portal.
lowSFC responsible officer and MIC expectations source-aligned
SFC licensing pages continue to frame responsible officers, senior management, and MIC accountability as central application evidence for licensed corporations.